Peer
Review
Find the Right Reviewer. Every Time.
Peer Review module eliminates the biggest bottleneck in scholarly publishing—reviewer selection. It automatically identifies and recommends the most relevant reviewers for each submitted article, ensuring faster acceptance and a smoother review cycle.
How can PeerReview Help you?
Redefine how manuscripts are reviewed with a process built for speed, fairness, and transparency. PageMajik streamlines peer review through automated reviewer discovery, configurable workflows, and integrity safeguards. Reviewer selection focuses on expertise and relevance, ensuring that each manuscript reaches the right experts for an informed and timely evaluation.
Reviewer selection engine analyzes abstracts and metadata to identify key entities, domains, and methods, ensuring precise reviewer matches. It blends topical relevance, performance history, and availability into a single fit score. Editors receive transparent reasoning codes, allowing quick, informed selections while minimizing conflicts of interest. The result is higher reviewer acceptance rates and faster assignment turnaround.
Editors can batch and prioritize invitations using reviewer selection engine’s ranked recommendations. Automated reminders and configurable due dates keep reviews on track. Invitation templates adapt automatically to article type and reviewer role, ensuring clarity and professionalism in every interaction.
Reviewers access manuscripts securely without logins through a streamlined workspace. The PDF appears alongside a structured review form with inline annotation tools and journal-specific instructions. Submitting a review automatically timestamps and archives it, ensuring accuracy and traceability.
Editors can monitor reviewer status in real time—invited, accepted, overdue, or submitted. Decision templates standardize editorial communication while allowing flexibility for comments and attachments. The system tracks every invitation, review, and correspondence for full transparency and audit readiness.
When revisions are requested, authors receive structured feedback in their Author Dashboard. Rebuttal letters and revised files are highlighted contextually showing exactly what changed and where. Editors and reviewers can instantly see updates in context—reducing rework and accelerating second-round reviews.
Every peer review action—discovery, invitation, response, review, and decision—is logged with timestamps, user IDs, and version history. Semantic scoring outputs are preserved, providing a transparent, auditable record of reviewer selection and decision-making.
Getting Started
Set up your journal’s peer review in minutes. Define review types, configure invitation templates, set response timelines, and assign roles for editors and reviewers. Once configured, invitations, reminders, and tracking run automatically—so your editorial team can focus on decisions, not administration.
Features and Benefits
Peer Review in PageMajik is designed to bring speed, structure, and consistency to every editorial decision. It automates reviewer discovery, invitations, reminders, and tracking—ensuring every manuscript is reviewed by the right experts on time. Editors gain full visibility across each stage, reviewers enjoy a seamless experience, and publishers maintain a transparent, auditable process that scales effortlessly across journals.
2x Reviewer Response Rate. 100% Process Control.
Built for reliability, the system identifies reviewers who are relevant, available, and responsive. Invitations and reminders are automated, reviews tracked in real time, and editorial teams always know where each manuscript stands. The result—faster acceptances, predictable timelines, and total control from start to finish.
A Seamless Experience for Every Reviewer
Reviewers receive a secure email link that opens directly to their personalized workspace—no registration or login required. The manuscript and review form appear side by side, with clear instructions and built-in tools for commenting and annotation. Reviews can be saved, updated, and submitted effortlessly, with automatic timestamping and confirmation. Every step is guided, efficient, and transparent, allowing reviewers to focus on providing quality feedback instead of navigating systems or formats.

PageMajik supports both open-ended and structured peer review models. Open-ended review allows narrative feedback with full flexibility, while structured review provides guided forms with defined criteria such as originality, clarity, and methodology—ensuring complete, comparable, and objective evaluations. Journals can choose the approach that best fits their editorial policy, combining reviewer freedom with the consistency needed for confident editorial decisions.
Features
PeerReview supports the following:
  • Reviewer discovery based on manuscript focus, research area, and prior performance
  • Automatic conflict-of-interest checks for shared institutions or collaborations
  • Configurable reviewer invitations and batch scheduling
  • Automated reminders and response tracking for deadlines
  • Customizable invitation and decision templates
  • Secure, no-login reviewer access through email links
  • Structured review forms with inline annotation tools
  • Journal-specific instructions embedded within the reviewer form
  • Auto-save, timestamping, and version control for each review
  • Centralized dashboard showing reviewer status (invited, accepted, overdue, submitted)
  • Side-by-side comparison of reviewer comments and recommendations
  • Integrated decision workflows and automated notifications
  • Structured reviewer feedback visible in the Author Dashboard for revisions
  • Rebuttal and revision tracking with change highlights
  • Complete correspondence record for every manuscript
  • Full audit trail with timestamps, user IDs, and document history
  • Role-based access control and data security compliance
Relevant Reviewers. Faster Reviews. Improved Turnaround.
Endless reviewer searches, unanswered invitations, and unpredictable timelines are now history. Peer Review brings structure and intelligence to the editorial process with evidence-based reviewer selection, automated workflows, and real-time tracking. Reviewers are identified using publication history, research focus, and prior performance, ensuring every manuscript reaches the most qualified experts. Editors can invite reviewers through secure links, monitor responses, and manage reviews efficiently without manual follow-ups or delays.

Every invitation, reminder, and response is handled automatically. Reviews are captured in a structured format, timelines are tracked, and decisions are supported by full transparency. The result: faster reviews, consistent outcomes, and an editorial process that runs with accuracy, accountability, and confidence.
Did you know?

The effort to find the right reviewer is often greater than the effort to review the manuscript: one of the main reasons peer review timelines stretch longer than expected.
Gain better visibility and control over your entire processes.
Retain control over your content; archive and retrieve at will.
Achieve a 20% cost-saving with our AI-based publishing solution.

See PageMajik in action
Contact
Privacy Policy
© 2025, PageMajik Inc. All rights reserved.